Anonymous user
Talk:Binary digits: Difference between revisions
→A mess?: Nice and ...
(FWIW I have exact ideas these things) |
(→A mess?: Nice and ...) |
||
Line 50:
:::It's a wiki. Just try and fix what you can. [[User:Markhobley|Markhobley]] 09:22, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
:::FWIW I have exact ideas about what "number", "digit", "number crunching", and "strings" are. To me, these are not hazy at all. It's just that my ideas do not necessarily match other people's ideas. :) Admittedly, I don't know a lot about printing, but rosetta code is teaching me some things here, and I can use google, so I will learn how to print.
:::Nice and fuzzy? No, nice and precise! I'm sure that there may well be other ways to get to precise, but being nice makes the journey more enjoyable. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 10:12, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
:: The task description now reads "natural numbers". Do we all agree that natural numbers are integers greater than or equal to zero? Or is this another source of confusion? [[User:Markhobley|Markhobley]] 09:22, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
| |||