Talk:Binary digits: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(The ZX Spectrum solution is also specifically designed for binary) |
(→Has to be a dupe: What the intent appears to be.) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
::: As it happens, the Tcl solution is one such. See, there may be some value after all! –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 08:27, 7 July 2011 (UTC) |
::: As it happens, the Tcl solution is one such. See, there may be some value after all! –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 08:27, 7 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
::: The ZX Spectrum Basic solution is also specifically designed for binary, so does not fall under [[Non-decimal radices/Convert]]. [[User:Markhobley|Markhobley]] 13:05, 7 July 2011 (UTC) |
::: The ZX Spectrum Basic solution is also specifically designed for binary, so does not fall under [[Non-decimal radices/Convert]]. [[User:Markhobley|Markhobley]] 13:05, 7 July 2011 (UTC) |
||
:::: As a friend of mine observed, the intent seems to be to implement a special-case of those other two tasks, without incurring the overhead of generalization. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 14:35, 7 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||