Talk:Best shuffle: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Deleted "J Implementation Notes" -- I think my description in "Common Lisp Example" does a much better job of explaining) |
(→Common Lisp: SBCL ignores extra parens in the repl? gee...) |
||
| Line 137: | Line 137: | ||
:: The code as posted doesn't compile. After removing two right parens, it compiles but produced wrong results: <code>abracadabra dcbaabarraa (2)</code>. |
:: The code as posted doesn't compile. After removing two right parens, it compiles but produced wrong results: <code>abracadabra dcbaabarraa (2)</code>. |
||
:: I looked at the code again, using <code>random</code> can't warrant correct results (note that a random shuffle can not garantee a result with minimal overlapping. Since it's random, you can't even garantee that after infinitely long run.) I'll mark it incorrect. --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 11:22, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
:: I looked at the code again, using <code>random</code> can't warrant correct results (note that a random shuffle can not garantee a result with minimal overlapping. Since it's random, you can't even garantee that after infinitely long run.) I'll mark it incorrect. --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 11:22, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
:::oops, i pasted the code back into the interpreter, to test it and didn't get any errors. |
:::oops, i pasted the code back into the interpreter, to test it and didn't get any errors. i use SBCL, which ignores extra parens silently! and CMUCL where i tested once only gave a warning.--[[User:EMBee|eMBee]] 18:21, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
||
:::thank you for clearing up the task description. i don't know when i'll find the time to fix it though.--[[User:EMBee|eMBee]] 11:52, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
:::thank you for clearing up the task description. i don't know when i'll find the time to fix it though.--[[User:EMBee|eMBee]] 11:52, 14 October 2011 (UTC) |
||