Anonymous user
Talk:BNF Grammar: Difference between revisions
Make it clearer that this is a deprecated task.
(→This is not WORKING: linking is great.) |
(Make it clearer that this is a deprecated task.) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{alertbox|#eeeeee|This task has been deprecated. Discussion of why is on this page, in [[#Task?|this section]].}}
==What's with all the empty header sections?==
No language will find this page on their "unimplemented tasks" page. --[[User:Glennj|glennj]] 11:40, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Line 50 ⟶ 51:
This is not a task. Moreover, being the grammars hardly works made by "us", we should check if their inclusion here is compatible with the GFDL. I suppose it should be so for any lang, but never say never. --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 15:05, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
: I find myself very much in agreement at this point; This task has gone from writing something descriptive or illustrative of the language to a list of off-site links. The task should be dismantled and the relevant links be put on the language's individual pages. For cases where we have the actual BNF code, with appropriate licensing, they can be moved to subpages of their relevant language. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 23:40, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
:: +1 --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 05:41, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
== Tcl's BNF ==
| |||