Talk:Attractive numbers: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Created page with "== optional requirements? == What about some ''optional'' requirements, such as: ::* showing the ''number'' (count) of attractive numbers up to an...") |
(→optional requirements?: A shame to be fruitlessly profligate with fuel while the glaciers melt) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The last optional requirement (extra credit) would/could show the robustness of the code. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 08:52, 11 April 2019 (UTC) |
The last optional requirement (extra credit) would/could show the robustness of the code. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 08:52, 11 April 2019 (UTC) |
||
:: I would suggest 10^5 but not 10^6, which would heat a lot of cores, reduce the number of participating languages, and perhaps yield rather limited additional insight or opportunities for learning ? |
|||
:: A shame to be fruitlessly profligate with fuel while the glaciers melt :-) [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 10:52, 11 April 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:53, 11 April 2019
optional requirements?
What about some optional requirements, such as:
- showing the number (count) of attractive numbers up to and including:
- 10,000
- 100,000
- 1,000,000
The last optional requirement (extra credit) would/could show the robustness of the code. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 08:52, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- I would suggest 10^5 but not 10^6, which would heat a lot of cores, reduce the number of participating languages, and perhaps yield rather limited additional insight or opportunities for learning ?