Anonymous user
Talk:Attractive numbers: Difference between revisions
m
→optional requirements?: added a kudos.
m (→optional requirements?: inserted a missing word.) |
m (→optional requirements?: added a kudos.) |
||
Line 21:
:::: I just saw a post (another Rosetta Code task) that (userid Horst.h) stated: --- Total power dissipation 115 watts running on all cores on all core (sic), ... 6-Core PC AMD Ryzen 5 1600 (3.4 Ghz on all cores Linux64 with SMT= on). So with six fast engines, 115 watts 'tain't that much, three times what I use on my (slower) one engine, but what the hey!! -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 17:53, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
:::: I see that the '''Pascal''' entry has computed (counted) the number of attractive numbers up to '''one billion''' (and took only 43 seconds). Now, that's going the extra mile, for sure. Kudos to (userid) Horst.h ! -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 13:56, 22 October 2019 (UTC)
| |||