Talk:Attractive numbers: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→optional requirements?: A shame to be fruitlessly profligate with fuel while the glaciers melt) |
m (:-)) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
:: A shame to be fruitlessly profligate with fuel while the glaciers melt :-) [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 10:52, 11 April 2019 (UTC) |
:: A shame to be fruitlessly profligate with fuel while the glaciers melt :-) [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 10:52, 11 April 2019 (UTC) |
||
::: :-)<br>--[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 12:20, 11 April 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:20, 11 April 2019
optional requirements?
What about some optional requirements, such as:
- showing the number (count) of attractive numbers up to and including:
- 10,000
- 100,000
- 1,000,000
The last optional requirement (extra credit) would/could show the robustness of the code. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 08:52, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- I would suggest 10^5 but not 10^6, which would heat a lot of cores, reduce the number of participating languages, and perhaps yield rather limited additional insight or opportunities for learning ?