Talk:Attractive numbers: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (added comments about power draw via a UPS, show a quote in italics.) |
(→optional requirements?: added another comment.) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
:::: I see that the '''Pascal''' entry has computed (counted) the number of attractive numbers up to '''one billion''' (and took only 43 seconds). Now, that's going the extra mile, for sure. Kudos to (userid) Horst.h ! -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 13:56, 22 October 2019 (UTC) |
:::: I see that the '''Pascal''' entry has computed (counted) the number of attractive numbers up to '''one billion''' (and took only 43 seconds). Now, that's going the extra mile, for sure. Kudos to (userid) Horst.h ! -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 13:56, 22 October 2019 (UTC) |
||
:::: (an update): I see that the '''Pascal''' entry has computed (counted) the number of attractive numbers up to '''ten billion'''. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 08:40, 23 October 2019 (UTC) |
|||