Talk:Associative array/Creation: Difference between revisions
→Requirements?: Good point, but I'd suggest replacing this one.
(→Requirements?: new section) |
(→Requirements?: Good point, but I'd suggest replacing this one.) |
||
Line 33:
As stated, this task is rather meaningless, since it does not specify any kind of array semantics which must be supported. We can assume "get element" and "set element", and I think the task should require examples of these assumable operations. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 18:47, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
: Not a bad point. Rather than rewriting the task description, though, I think it would be a good idea to create a replacement task and phase this one out. There aren't active contributors for all of the languages, and some languages don't get much ENA maintenance. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 23:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
| |||