Talk:Array map: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:: Now the fact that i'm using bugmenot is a different issue. Your attitude towards bugmenot shouldn't affect whether the content is usable or not. I can kinda see why you'd think it's a beachhead for spam, but as [[User:Rdm|Rdm]] said, any account can be created without e-mail verification and could just as well be beachhead accounts. --[[User:Bugmenot2|Bugmenot2]] ([[User talk:Bugmenot2|talk]]) 13:34, 21 October 2015 (UTC) |
:: Now the fact that i'm using bugmenot is a different issue. Your attitude towards bugmenot shouldn't affect whether the content is usable or not. I can kinda see why you'd think it's a beachhead for spam, but as [[User:Rdm|Rdm]] said, any account can be created without e-mail verification and could just as well be beachhead accounts. --[[User:Bugmenot2|Bugmenot2]] ([[User talk:Bugmenot2|talk]]) 13:34, 21 October 2015 (UTC) |
||
::: I have absolutely no means of knowing whether one sentence signed "BugMeNot" is written by the same author as another. Neither do I have the time or inclination make the effort to find out. [[User:Rdm|Rdm]] has argued that such tags could conceivably be interpreted as representing a corporate or collective entity, but a weakness of that argument seems to me to be that there is no coherent institution, practice or process of delegation behind them. They have more in common with things randomly picked out of (and perhaps repeatedly returned to) trash cans in a public park. Anyone who wished to speak (and be replied to) in the voice or guise of a coherent and persistent 'person' or contributing institution would simply need to obtain their own username and password. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 14:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC) |
|||
== draft task == |
== draft task == |
||