Talk:Array: Difference between revisions
Encyclopedia and formality
m (Example does not demonstrate all qualities of an array mentioned in the description) |
(Encyclopedia and formality) |
||
Line 9:
::(don't mind me, just throwing out ideas...) [[User:Sgeier|Sgeier]] 17:09, 3 January 2008 (MST)
::: Since its inception, I've wanted Rosetta Code to have encyclopedic content. Both our current browsing indexes focus on tasks, but there is a growing numper of non-task categories and pages that probably deserve a third, encyclopedic index. I'll get on that.
::: Oh...And I've only been as far as calc 2; Formal descriptions of computer science topics annoy the hell out of me, and are often beyond me. I have no problem with formal descriptions being on RC, but I definitely want to see informal descriptions accompanying them. --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 23:26, 5 January 2008 (MST)
:The example shown does not clearly demonstrate all the qualities of an array mentioned in the description. For instance, the description states that it is illegal to exceed the upper bound of an array. The example does not demonstrate any check for bounds overflow. The discussion does not indicate what happens to an array when the lower bound is violated. I think it would be good to provide an example more completely demonstrating the behaviors of an array.--[[User:Waldorf|Waldorf]] 16:39, 5 January 2008 (MST)
| |||