Talk:Arithmetic numbers: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Seems like an easy mistake...)
 
(→‎interpretation?: Fixed now.)
 
Line 6: Line 6:


But the xth arithmetic number is not <= x. (There are 782 composite arithmetic numbers less than or equal to 1361, but there are only 559 arithmetic numbers less than or equal to 1000.) --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 22:32, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
But the xth arithmetic number is not <= x. (There are 782 composite arithmetic numbers less than or equal to 1361, but there are only 559 arithmetic numbers less than or equal to 1000.) --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 22:32, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

: Doh, thanks I've fixed it. --[[User:PureFox|PureFox]] ([[User talk:PureFox|talk]]) 22:47, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 22:48, 13 June 2022

interpretation?

The task asks for:

2. The xth arithmetic number where x = 1,000 and x = 10,000.
3. How many arithmetic numbers <= x are composite.

But the xth arithmetic number is not <= x. (There are 782 composite arithmetic numbers less than or equal to 1361, but there are only 559 arithmetic numbers less than or equal to 1000.) --Rdm (talk) 22:32, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Doh, thanks I've fixed it. --PureFox (talk) 22:47, 13 June 2022 (UTC)