Anonymous user
Talk:Arithmetic/Rational: Difference between revisions
Yep
(Too long) |
(Yep) |
||
Line 5:
Another, separate task could focus on operator overloading. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 12:58, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
:Agreed. This task should simply be about the definition of a rational type and maybe a couple of helper functions (like reduction). There should be no operator definition in this task. That is covered [[Matrix_exponentiation_operator|elsewhere]]. If you still want the operator functionality, then named functions would be preferred so the task isn't restricted to languages with operator definition. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 13:47, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
| |||