Anonymous user
Talk:Arithmetic/Complex: Difference between revisions
complex is in C99
(Error in C example) |
(complex is in C99) |
||
Line 2:
:The Ada entry has been amended to include negation. --[[User:Waldorf|Waldorf]] 14:40, 9 March 2008 (MDT)
I believe the C example is incorrect. The current written example relies upon operator overloading which is not supported by C99.--[[User:Waldorf|Waldorf]] 09:10, 11 March 2008 (MDT)
:I did some looking; there are complex built-in types in the C99 standard, with defined implicit casts up and down to the other numeric primitives. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 10:36, 11 March 2008 (MDT)
| |||