Anonymous user
Talk:Arbitrary-precision integers (included): Difference between revisions
Talk:Arbitrary-precision integers (included) (view source)
Revision as of 12:55, 13 February 2010
, 14 years ago"Precision" a misnomer?
(→Criteria for Non-Draft?: new section) |
("Precision" a misnomer?) |
||
Line 10:
What are the criteria for making this page a full task? There are already a number of implementations and the task itself is largely clear too. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 11:51, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
==“Precision”==
Is the use of “precision” appropriate? To me, “precision” suggests ''fractional'' digits (to the right of the decimal[-or-binary] point). —[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 12:55, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
| |||