Talk:Approximate equality: Difference between revisions
→Insufficient test cases and incorrect implementations
Line 8:
:I made a minor grammatical adjustment to you post which made it clearer to me, says x ==> implies "x".
:It (now) strikes me the third case should really have had two 1 on the rhs, then it would be a blatent error if test 1 and test 3 gave different results.
:<small>(Clearly the Java entry should be given some sort of special prize for getting cases 3, 4, 6, ''and'' 7 wrong!)</small>
:The tests should have expected results explicitly stated, that is beyond 1 and 2, "Otherwise answers may vary and still be correct." is an absolute cop-out if ever I saw one.
:A consistent output should be specified, I quite like the idea of "==" and "~=" columns. I could go on.
| |||