Talk:Anonymous recursion: Difference between revisions

Line 219:
::--[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 22:44, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
:: Your observation of "not polluting the global name space" seems to me to be spot on on how this is being interpreted and implemented. But I'm not certain that I know enough about the task author's intent to say. That raises the question, should the task be changed? Clarified? Renamed? Both? Should implementations be marked incorrect? Given the number of solutions in place, the last choice is not one I'd take. If the intent was missed change the task and if desired create a draft with a better description of the intent with clearer guidelines. --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 23:02, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
::: This was created by Abu in November - can you way in.
Anonymous user