Revision as of 02:29, 7 May 2013 (view source) MikeMol (talk \| contribs) (→‎FBSL "calling" C - part 2: No hammering of a gavel.) ← Older edit		Revision as of 03:39, 7 May 2013 (view source) rosettacode>Alansam (→‎error in ooRexx ?) Newer edit →
Line 31: No problem with ooRexx! --[[User:Walterpachl\|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl\|talk]]) 22:56, 6 May 2013 (UTC) [[ooRexx]] and roo!<sup>TM</sup> use completely different conventions to glue Object Oriented capabilities onto Rexx and as such it's unlikely that any non-trivial "Object Oriented" ooRexx program will run with the roo!<sup>TM</sup> interpreter and vice versa.--[[User:Alansam\|Alansam]] ([[User talk:Alansam\|talk]]) 03:39, 7 May 2013 (UTC) ==FBSL calling C: Is it useful?==

Talk:Anagrams: Difference between revisions

Talk:Anagrams (view source)