Talk:Anagrams: Difference between revisions

→‎FBSL "calling" C - part 2: Hopefully to be conceived as less condescending...
(→‎FBSL "calling" C - part 2: Hopefully to be conceived as less condescending...)
Line 120:
 
:: I think you also misunderstood my comment about sizes. I was not saying that your implementation had to be huge (especially since you are platform specific and relying on windows - which is "huge"), but instead was saying that the resource constraints which motivated the design of many current languages (BASIC, C, ...) are being relaxed. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 15:47, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 
::Yo The Watcher.<br>Try re-reading my posts with a less defensive attitude, not everyone is out to get you.
::I find it hard to judge how to reply to people and do try not be offensive. Well, you didn't think I was being offensive, just maybe talking down to you. OK I heard that. As for any ''verdict'', I don't think this is a ''trial''. I did however add some constructive notes on how you could make your language shine in my last post, why not try them? Or not. Whatever... --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 16:55, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Anonymous user