Talk:Anagrams: Difference between revisions

::: The interesting issue, here, I think, is: how complete is this entry? How hard is it for another programmer (like [[User:Paddy3118|Paddy]]) to make this solution work? [This is an exercise I often try, when I see something in a language that I am curious about.] Looking at the language page, FBSL supports grammar and syntax of several languages. Perl6 has analogous plans. I think that the primary issues here are syntax (which can be abstracted within a ''top level block scope'' if it's simple enough) and semantics - which mostly just eat storage for the implementation. There can also be issues of names and contexts (scopes) but that only matters when they are dirty (when they appear on the interface boundaries between modules). Given modern machine sizes (I'm composing this on a laptop with 16GB ram and half a terabyte of disk), and Moore's law, I expect more of this "melding of languages" in the future. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 12:22, 6 May 2013 (UTC)