Talk:Anagrams: Difference between revisions
→FBSL calling C: Is it useful?
(→FBSL calling C: Is it useful?: Show us.) |
|||
Line 60:
::If you are that different then you may have to meet your audience half way. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 11:23, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
::: The interesting issue, here, I think, is: how complete is this entry? How hard is it for anther programmer (like [[User:Paddy3118|Paddy]]) to make this solution work? [This is an exercise I often try, when I see something in a language that I am curious about.] Looking at the language page, FBSL supports grammar and syntax several languages. Perl6 has analogous plans. Given modern machine sizes (I'm composing this on a laptop with 16GB ram and half a terabyte of disk), and Moore's law, I expect more of this melding of languages in the future. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 12:22, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
| |||