Talk:Anagrams: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (→REXX: my error??) |
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) m (→REXX: typos) |
||
| Line 182: | Line 182: | ||
(Especially for examples that no longer exist!) Getting repeatable results is problematic. Also, not knowing what hardware and/or operating system and/or which compiler/interpreter (or version) was used, or for that matter, what ''code'' (program statements) were used, etc, makes it difficult to judge the veracity of the timings. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 07:33, 5 August 2013 (UTC) |
(Especially for examples that no longer exist!) Getting repeatable results is problematic. Also, not knowing what hardware and/or operating system and/or which compiler/interpreter (or version) was used, or for that matter, what ''code'' (program statements) were used, etc, makes it difficult to judge the veracity of the timings. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 07:33, 5 August 2013 (UTC) |
||
:: You could have said: "thanks for making me improve my code (significantly) no matter what hardware is used." But he who |
:: You could have said: "thanks for making me improve my code (significantly) no matter what hardware is used." But he who expects nothing shall not be disappointed. The example still exists in rosettacode's history. --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 11:40, 5 August 2013 (UTC) |
||
There seems to be an error in the REXX code. Applying the program to a very small dictionary |
There seems to be an error in the REXX code. Applying the program to a very small dictionary |
||