Anonymous user
Talk:Active Directory/Connect: Difference between revisions
agree, verbosely
m (That was weird...) |
(agree, verbosely) |
||
Line 9:
Should it be deleted (With [[Search for a User in Active Directory]])? --[[User:Guga360|Guga360]] 21:09, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
:Since they're so limited and especially if they're obsolete, I wouldn't be opposed to deleting them. I've never even heard of active directory anyway :p. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 21:13, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
:I feel these tasks should be removed. I don't have any really solid justification though. How about this: Since Active Directory is not AFAIK a widely-implemented and used protocol, these tasks would not show much that is informative about the ''languages'' they would be implemented in. (However, I don't want to also justify removing e.g. XML, SOAP, SQL ... tasks -- I think the distinction should be that if there is enough interest that the libraries for doing the protocol/whatever are in competition or otherwise refined to fit well with many languages, then it's reasonable to include such tasks in RC.) --[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 22:16, 13 May 2009 (UTC), waving hands vigorously
| |||