Talk:Active Directory/Connect: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 14:
:: Agree. These tasks haven't (hadn't?) any attractiveness (to me). --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 22:47, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 
:: :Disagree. Sure the task needs a little refinement to keep up with modern terminology, but that's hardly that hard for someone who knows it. More seriously, we need to encourage someone with more Win coding chops (well, more than me) to do a second implementation. It must be possible to do; I believe it's not much more than LDAP... —[[User:Dkf|Dkf]] 00:05, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 
:::: My day (and night, and every hour in between, lately) job is Win32 coding. I could give it a crack when work slacks off, but I'll have to do it in off time at the office since I've only got Linux at home. (And I'll have to learn LDAP, but there's no harm in that, really.) --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 02:19, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 
::::: I wouldn't say that there's no harm in LDAP, or at least not unless your query model is about at the level that could be supported with an /etc/passwd file anyway. For auth, that's not a big deal. For anything more complex... excuse me, but I need to lie down. —[[User:Dkf|Dkf]] 10:27, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
 
== Description ==
 
where is the description of this problem ?
[[Special:Contributions/200.144.37.3|200.144.37.3]] 10:56, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 
: There's the the title. You're supposed to guess what to do from there it seems. (Why not try writing a description of the task? That will no doubt help...) –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 12:44, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 
: Somebody please write a description, each task has one. Thanks. --[[Special:Contributions/190.51.100.206|190.51.100.206]] 19:27, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Anonymous user