Talk:AKS test for primes: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (→Lower Limit) |
(→Lower Limit: Yea, 1!) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
It could also be worded that there isn't any number in the empty set that is divisible by <math>1</math>. I think 1 should simply be ignored [[User:Denommus|Denommus]] |
It could also be worded that there isn't any number in the empty set that is divisible by <math>1</math>. I think 1 should simply be ignored [[User:Denommus|Denommus]] |
||
:If you can "sweep it under the carpet" then why not? It is a small part of the task. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 19:34, 7 February 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:34, 7 February 2014
Combinations
There is a link between the coefficients of the expansion of and nCr. --Paddy3118 (talk) 20:56, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Lower Limit
Again... 1 appears as an "is it prime, isn't it prime" candidate.
is prime if all the coefficients of the polynomial expansion of: are divisible by . All the coefficients is the empty set. 1 is divisible by absolutely everything in the empty set. Is there a better wording out there? (That doesn't include the phrases "any number not 1" or "any number > 1") Tim-brown
It could also be worded that there isn't any number in the empty set that is divisible by . I think 1 should simply be ignored Denommus