Template talk:Strings: Difference between revisions
m →related tasks concerning (character) strings: added comments. |
less ; |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Another class of related tasks would be various forms of encryption/decryption and encoding/decoding. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:48, 5 October 2020 (UTC) |
Another class of related tasks would be various forms of encryption/decryption and encoding/decoding. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:48, 5 October 2020 (UTC) |
||
I think it looks better without the ; on each sub-heading, but I'll not argue about it. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 13:26, 11 October 2020 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 13:26, 11 October 2020
Many Rosetta Code tasks deal with (character) strings, whether that includes character strings that happen to be numeric (that is, decimal digits, or possibly in other bases).
I tried to include Rosetta Code tasks that deal with character strings that included numeric digits, even though some (or maybe most) Rosetta Code language examples/entries may have elected to treat/handle the character string as numeric digits (i.e., as a number). The inclusion should probably include sequences that are, in fact, sequences of various flavors of character strings, whether or not most of the strings deal with the numeric part of a string.
Two related tasks for the strings template could be:
Another class of related tasks would be various forms of encryption/decryption and encoding/decoding. -- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 22:48, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
I think it looks better without the ; on each sub-heading, but I'll not argue about it. --Pete Lomax (talk) 13:26, 11 October 2020 (UTC)