Smarandache prime-digital sequence: Difference between revisions
m
→{{header|Phix}}: 3rd
m (→{{header|Phix}}: added largest <10,000,000 etc) |
m (→{{header|Phix}}: 3rd) |
||
Line 1,203:
Go took 1 min 50 secs to calculate the 100,000th number - the optimised version got that down to 5.6s<br>
Julia crashed when the limit was changed to 100,000, however it took 11s just to calculate the 10,000th number anyway.<br>
The original Raku version was by far the slowest of all I tried, taking 1 min 15s just to calculate the 10,000th number, however it has since been replaced (I cannot actually run the latest Raku version, but I assume it is similar to the Perl one) and that completes near-instantly. Adding two 0 to limit in the C entry above gets a matching 777777773 on tio/clang in 27s, not directly comparable, and obviously you cannot add a
=={{header|Python}}==
| |||