Singleton: Difference between revisions
Add Ecstasy example
(Singleton en FreeBASIC) |
(Add Ecstasy example) |
||
(13 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
Line 6:
=={{header|ActionScript}}==
<
{
public class Singleton
Line 25:
}
internal class SingletonEnforcer {}</
=={{header|Ada}}==
===Non Thread Safe===
<
procedure Set_Data (Value : Integer);
function Get_Data return Integer;
Line 38:
end record;
Instance : Instance_Type;
end Global_Singleton;</
<
--------------
Line 60:
end Get_Data;
end Global_Singleton;</
===Thread Safe===
<
procedure Set_Data (Value : Integer);
function Get_Data return Integer;
Line 73:
Data : Integer := 0;
end Instance_Type;
end Protected_Singleton;</
<
--------------
Line 121:
end Instance;
end Protected_Singleton;</
=={{header|AutoHotkey}}==
{{works with | AutoHotkey_L}}
Translation of python borg pattern
<
b2 := borg()
msgbox % "b1 is b2? " . (b1 == b2)
Line 153:
brg[1, name] := val
Return val
}</
=={{header|BASIC}}==
==={{header|FreeBASIC}}===
<syntaxhighlight lang="freebasic">
REM Sacado del forum de FreeBASIC (https://www.freebasic.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=20432)
Type singleton
Public :
Declare Static Function crearInstancia() As singleton Ptr
Declare Destructor ()
Dim i As Integer
Private :
Declare Constructor()
Declare Constructor(Byref rhs As singleton)
Declare Static Function instancia(Byval crear As Integer) As singleton Ptr
End Type
Static Function singleton.crearInstancia() As singleton Ptr
Return singleton.instancia(1)
End Function
Static Function singleton.instancia(Byval crear As Integer) As singleton Ptr
Static ref As singleton Ptr = 0
Function = 0
If crear = 0 Then
ref = 0
Elseif ref = 0 Then
ref = New singleton
Function = ref
End If
End Function
Constructor singleton ()
End Constructor
Destructor singleton()
singleton.instancia(0)
End Destructor
'-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dim As singleton Ptr ps1 = singleton.crearinstancia()
ps1->i = 1234
Print ps1, ps1->i
Dim As singleton Ptr ps2 = singleton.crearinstancia()
Print ps2
Delete ps1
Dim As singleton Ptr ps3 = singleton.crearinstancia()
Print ps3, ps3->i
Delete ps3
Sleep
</syntaxhighlight>
{{out}}
<pre>
2038352 1234
0
2038352 0
</pre>
==={{header|OxygenBasic}}===
<syntaxhighlight lang="oxygenbasic">
Class Singleton
static sys inst 'private
int instantiated() { return inst }
void constructor(){ if not inst then inst=@this }
'all other methods start with @this=inst
end class
'if not singleton.instantiated
new Singleton MySingleton
'endif
</syntaxhighlight>
==={{header|PureBasic}}===
====Native version====
Thread safe version.
<syntaxhighlight lang="purebasic">Global SingletonSemaphore=CreateSemaphore(1)
Interface OO_Interface ; Interface for any value of this type
Get.i()
Set(Value.i)
Destroy()
EndInterface
Structure OO_Structure ; The *VTable structure
Get.i
Set.i
Destroy.i
EndStructure
Structure OO_Var
*VirtualTable.OO_Structure
Value.i
EndStructure
Procedure OO_Get(*Self.OO_Var)
ProcedureReturn *Self\Value
EndProcedure
Procedure OO_Set(*Self.OO_Var, n)
*Self\Value = n
EndProcedure
Procedure CreateSingleton()
If TrySemaphore(SingletonSemaphore)
*p.OO_Var = AllocateMemory(SizeOf(OO_Var))
If *p
*p\VirtualTable = ?VTable
EndIf
EndIf
ProcedureReturn *p
EndProcedure
Procedure OO_Destroy(*Self.OO_Var)
FreeMemory(*Self)
SignalSemaphore(SingletonSemaphore)
EndProcedure
DataSection
VTable:
Data.i @OO_Get()
Data.i @OO_Set()
Data.i @OO_Destroy()
EndDataSection</syntaxhighlight>
====Simple OOP extension====
Using the open-source precompiler [http://www.development-lounge.de/viewtopic.php?t=5915 SimpleOOP].
<syntaxhighlight lang="purebasic">Singleton Class Demo
BeginPrivate
Name$
X.i
EndPrivate
Public Method Init(Name$)
This\Name$ = Name$
EndMethod
Public Method GetX()
MethodReturn This\X
EndMethod
Public Method SetX(n)
This\X = n
EndMethod
Public Method Hello()
MessageRequester("Hello!", "I'm "+This\Name$)
EndMethod
EndClass</syntaxhighlight>
=={{header|C}}==
Since C doesn't really support classes anyhow, there's not much to do. If you want somethin akin to a singleton, what you do is first declare the interface functions in a header (.h) file.
<
#define SILLY_H
Line 163 ⟶ 315:
extern int PlayFetchWithDog( float weightOfStick);
#endif</
Then in a separate C source (.c) file, define your structures, variables and functions.
<
#include "silly.h"
Line 189 ⟶ 341:
{ ...
if(weightOfStick < lazyDog.max_stick_weight){...
}</
Code using the singleton includes the header and cannot create a
struct sDog as the definition is only in the C source (or other header privately included by the silly.c source). Only the functions declared in the header may be used externally.
<
#include "silly.h"
...
Line 198 ⟶ 350:
JumpOverTheDog( 4);
retrieved = PlayFetchWithDog( 3.1);
...</
=={{header|C sharp|C#}}==
Line 204 ⟶ 356:
Performance suffers because the lock is acquired every time Instance is accessed.<br />
This implementation is extremely slow and should not be used (but is seen often).
<
{
private static Singleton1 instance;
Line 219 ⟶ 371:
}
}
}</
===Fixes excessive locking by double-checking for null.===
Still uses locking and implementation is ugly and verbose.
<
{
private static Singleton2 instance;
Line 240 ⟶ 392:
}
}
}</
===Really simple implementation without locking.===
It still is not completely lazy. If there are other static members, accessing any of those will still cause initialization.
<
{
private static Singleton3 Instance { get; } = new Singleton3();
static Singleton3() { }
}</
===Truly lazy by using an inner class.===
This version is completely lazy but the code looks more complicated than it needs to be.
<
{
public static Singleton4 Instance => SingletonHolder.instance;
Line 263 ⟶ 415:
internal static readonly Singleton4 instance = new Singleton4();
}
}</
===Using Lazy<T>===
C# has a dedicated type for lazy initialization: Lazy<T>.<br />
It makes implementing a Singleton really easy. Recommended.
<
{
private static readonly Lazy<Singleton5> lazy = new Lazy<Singleton5>(() => new Singleton5());
public static Singleton5 Instance => lazy.Value;
}</
=={{header|C++}}==
A generic singleton template class (implemented via the "Curiously Recurring Template Pattern"[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curiously_recurring_template_pattern]). Warning: if using a version of C++ prior to C++11, a [[Mutex#C|mutex]] (or similar) is required to access static variables within a multi-threaded program.
<
#include <stdexcept>
Line 378 ⟶ 530:
controller::instance().work();
}
</syntaxhighlight>
=={{header|Caché ObjectScript}}==
Line 384 ⟶ 536:
In Caché, each job runs in a self-contained execution environment (i.e. a separate process instead of a thread). However, it is possible for each process to share data through multidimensional storage (global variables). This is because when the Caché virtual machine starts, it allocates a single, large chunk of shared memory to allow all Caché processes to access this data simultaneously. However, it is the responsibility of the application developer to ensure read and write access to objects is properly co-ordinated (or 'synchronized') between processes to prevent concurrency problems. Also, Caché defines any global variable whose name starts with 'CacheTemp' as being temporary, which means changes are not usually written to disk and are instead maintained within the in-memory buffer pool.
<
/// The <CLASS>Singleton</CLASS> class represents a global singleton object that can
/// be instantiated by multiple processes. The 'Get' class method is used to obtain
Line 516 ⟶ 668:
}
</syntaxhighlight>
{{out|Examples}}
Line 530 ⟶ 682:
For a simple example, the following program constructs English sentences without worrying about extra space occurring at points where no text (<code>the-empty-phrase</code>, our singleton) is inserted.
<
(:documentation "Concatenate two phrases."))
Line 553 ⟶ 705:
(dolist (q (list 'the-empty-phrase
(make-instance 'nonempty-phrase :text "up the hill")))
(write-line (text (reduce #'concat (list before p mid q after))))))))</
Thread safety is irrelevant since the singleton is created at load time, not first access.
=={{header|D}}==
<
import std.stdio ;
import std.thread ;
Line 617 ⟶ 769:
x.wait ; y.wait ; z.wait ;
}</
{{out}}
<pre>>>Mary come in.
Line 641 ⟶ 793:
=={{header|Delphi}} and {{header|Pascal}}==
Detailed explanation [http://www.yanniel.info/2010/10/singleton-pattern-delphi.html here]. (Delphi started out as an object-oriented version of Pascal.)
<
interface
Line 680 ⟶ 832:
end;
end.</
=={{header|E}}==
Since E uses closure-style objects rather than classes, a singleton is simply an object which is defined at the top level of the program, not inside any method. There are no thread-safety issues since the singleton, like every other object, belongs to some particular [http://www.erights.org/elib/concurrency/vat.html vat] (but can be remotely invoked from other vats).
<
# ...
}</
=={{header|Ecstasy}}==
The <code>static</code> keyword in a class declaration will compile that class as a singleton. It is legal to define <code>const</code> (i.e. immutable) and <code>service</code> classes as singletons. Modules, packages, and enumeration values are always singleton classes. It is <b>not</b> legal to define normal <code>class</code> classes as singletons, because normal classes are mutable, and Ecstasy does not allow shared mutable state.
The name of the class is used to specify that singleton instance:
<syntaxhighlight lang="ecstasy">
module test {
static service Singleton {
private Int counter;
String fooHasBeenCalled() {
return $"{++counter} times";
}
}
void run() {
@Inject Console console;
for (Int i : 1..5) {
console.print($"{Singleton.fooHasBeenCalled()=}");
}
}
}
</syntaxhighlight>
{{out}}
<pre>
x$ xec test
Singleton.fooHasBeenCalled()=1 times
Singleton.fooHasBeenCalled()=2 times
Singleton.fooHasBeenCalled()=3 times
Singleton.fooHasBeenCalled()=4 times
Singleton.fooHasBeenCalled()=5 times
</pre>
=={{header|Eiffel}}==
Line 693 ⟶ 878:
'''Implementation:'''
<
SINGLETON
create {SINGLETON_ACCESS}
Line 699 ⟶ 884:
feature
-- singleton features go here
end</
<
SINGLETON_ACCESS
feature
Line 709 ⟶ 894:
Result /= Void
end
end</
'''Usage:'''
<
s := (create{SINGLETON_ACCESS}).singleton -- in some routine</
=={{header|Elena}}==
Stateless singleton
<
singleton Singleton
{
// ...
}
</syntaxhighlight>
Normal singleton
<
{
object theField;
Line 731 ⟶ 916:
}
static singleton = new Singleton();</
=={{header|EMal}}==
<syntaxhighlight lang="emal">
type Singleton
model
text greeting
fun speak = void by block do writeLine(me.greeting + " I'm a singleton") end
end
Singleton instance
fun getInstance = Singleton by block
if instance == null do instance = Singleton() end
return instance
end
type SomeOtherType
Singleton s1 = Singleton.getInstance()
s1.greeting = "Hello"
Singleton s2 = Singleton.getInstance()
s2.greeting.append(", World!")
writeLine(s1 + " and " + s2 + " are the same object: " + (s1 == s2) + ", s2: " + s2.greeting)
s1.speak() # call instance method
</syntaxhighlight>
{{out}}
<pre>
§(0x02bf8098) and §(0x02bf8098) are the same object: ⊤, s2: Hello, World!
Hello, World! I'm a singleton
</pre>
=={{header|Epoxy}}==
<syntaxhighlight lang="epoxy">fn Singleton()
if this.self then return this.self cls
var new: {}
iter k,v as this._props do
new[k]:v
cls
this.self:new
return new
cls
Singleton._props: {
name: "Singleton",
fn setName(self,new)
self.name:new
cls,
}
var MySingleton: Singleton()
log(MySingleton == Singleton()) --true
log(MySingleton.name) --Singleton
var NewSingleton: Singleton()
NewSingleton>>setName("Test")
log(MySingleton.name) --Test</syntaxhighlight>
{{out}}
<pre>
true
Singleton
Test
</pre>
=={{header|Erlang}}==
Erlang is not object-oriented, so there is no such thing as a singleton class. The singleton is something of an anti-pattern in Erlang, so if you are tempted to do this, there is probably a better architecture. If you do want something akin to a singleton, you start and register a process that maintains its state in a message loop and provides its state to anyone that wants it or needs to change it. Since this is done with message passing, it's safe for concurrent use.
<
-export([get/0, set/1, start/0]).
Line 767 ⟶ 1,010:
From ! ok,
loop(NewValue)
end.</
Here is an example of how to use it (from the shell). It assumes singleton:start/0 was already called from the supervisor tree (as would be typical if you were using something like this).
<
not_set
2> singleton:set(apple).
Line 784 ⟶ 1,027:
ok
7> singleton:get().
{ok,42}</
=={{header|Factor}}==
<
IN: singleton-demo
SINGLETON: bar
GENERIC: foo ( obj -- )
M: bar foo drop "Hello!" print ;</
( scratchpad ) bar foo
Hello!
Line 800 ⟶ 1,043:
Works with any ANS Forth
Needs the
https://github.com/DouglasBHoffman/FMS2/tree/master/FMS2VT
<
\ A singleton is created by using normal Forth data
Line 830 ⟶ 1,073:
s1 printb \ => 9
s2 printa \ => 4
</syntaxhighlight>
=={{header|Go}}==
Line 897 ⟶ 1,079:
From the Go standard library, sync.Once provides a way to ensure that some "step," effectively an initialization step, is performed no more than once even if it might be attempted from multiple concurrent goroutines. This capability might be considered similar to some mechanism ensuring that singleton constructor code is only run once.
<
import (
Line 927 ⟶ 1,109:
w.Wait()
log.Println("after trying both, instance =", instance)
}</
{{out}}
<pre>
Line 942 ⟶ 1,124:
Because packages cannot be imported multiple times, data declared at package level will only ever have a single instance, and the package as a whole serves as a singleton.
<
// package level data declarations serve as singleton instance variables
Line 955 ⟶ 1,137:
func F() int {
return Y - X
}</
Example program using the package:
<
import (
Line 968 ⟶ 1,150:
fmt.Println(singlep.X, singlep.Y)
fmt.Println(singlep.F())
}</
{{out}}
<pre>
Line 979 ⟶ 1,161:
This example combines the two previous concepts and also shows some additional concepts. It has packages imported with a "diamond" dependency. While both <code>red</code> and <code>blue</code> import <code>single</code>, only a single variable <code>color</code> will exist in memory. The <code>init()</code> mechanism shown above actually runs before <code>main()</code>. In contrast, the <code>sync.Once</code> mechanism can serve as constructor code after <code>main()</code> begins.
<
import (
Line 1,002 ⟶ 1,184:
once.Do(func() { color = c })
log.Println("color initialized to", color)
}</
<
import (
Line 1,014 ⟶ 1,196:
log.Println("trying to set red")
single.SetColor("red")
}</
<
import (
Line 1,026 ⟶ 1,208:
log.Println("trying to set blue")
single.SetColor("blue")
}</
<
import (
Line 1,050 ⟶ 1,232:
}
log.Println(single.Color())
}</
{{out}}
<pre>
Line 1,063 ⟶ 1,245:
=={{header|Groovy}}==
<
class SingletonClass {
Line 1,073 ⟶ 1,255:
SingletonClass.instance.invokeMe()
}
}</
{{out}}
<pre>invoking method of a singleton class</pre>
Line 1,079 ⟶ 1,261:
==Icon and {{header|Unicon}}==
Icon is not object oriented, but Unicon supports O-O programming.
<
method print()
write("Hi there.")
Line 1,091 ⟶ 1,273:
Singleton().print()
Singleton().print()
end</
This Unicon example uses a number of Icon features.
Line 1,103 ⟶ 1,285:
=={{header|Io}}==
Io does not have globals. But it is easy to make singleton objects:
<
Singleton clone = Singleton</
=={{header|J}}==
Line 1,114 ⟶ 1,296:
===Thread-safe===
[[wp:Double-checked locking]]; only use with Java 1.5+
<
{
private static Singleton myInstance;
Line 1,139 ⟶ 1,321:
// Any other methods
}</
===Thread-Safe Lazy-Loaded===
This is the [[wp:Initialization-on-demand holder idiom]].
<
private Singleton() {
// Constructor code goes here.
Line 1,155 ⟶ 1,337:
return LazyHolder.INSTANCE;
}
}</
===Thread-Safe Using Enum ===
Enums in Java are fully-fledged classes with specific instances, and are an idiomatic way to create singletons.
<syntaxhighlight lang="java">public enum Singleton {
INSTANCE;
// Fields, constructors and methods...
private int value;
Singleton() {
value = 0;
}
public int getValue() {
return value;
}
public void setValue(int value) {
this.value = value;
}
}</syntaxhighlight>
===Non-Thread-Safe===
<
{
private static Singleton myInstance;
Line 1,177 ⟶ 1,377:
// Any other methods
}</
=={{header|JavaScript}}==
<
if(Singleton._instance) return Singleton._instance;
this.set("");
Line 1,199 ⟶ 1,399:
c.append("!!!");
document.write( (new Singleton()).get() );</
=={{header|Julia}}==
Julia allows singletons as type declarations without further specifiers. There can be only one instance of such a type, and if more than one variable is bound to such a type they are actually all bound to the same instance in memory:
<
struct IAmaSingleton end
Line 1,210 ⟶ 1,410:
println("x == y is $(x == y) and x === y is $(x === y).")
</syntaxhighlight>
=={{header|Kotlin}}==
Kotlin has built-in support for singletons via object declarations. To refer to the singleton, we simply use its name which can be any valid identifier other than a keyword:
<
object Singleton {
Line 1,222 ⟶ 1,422:
fun main(args: Array<String>) {
Singleton.speak()
}</
{{out}}
Line 1,228 ⟶ 1,428:
I am a singleton
</pre>
=={{header|M2000 Interpreter}}==
<syntaxhighlight lang="m2000 interpreter">
Module CheckSingleton {
\\ singleton
\\ pointers and static groups are the same object because
\\ each one has a pointer to same state (a tuple)
\\ but from outside we do the miracle to have a static group to act as a pointer
\\ We need a lambda function to hold the pointer to Singleton as closure
Global One=lambda M=pointer() (aValue=0)-> {
If M is type null then
\\ one time happen
Group Singleton {
Type:One
Private:
state=(aValue,)
Public:
module Add (x) {
.state+=x
}
Set {Drop}
Value {
=.state#val(0)
}
}
M->group(Singleton)
end if
\\ return M which is a pointer
=M
}
K=One(100)
Print Eval(K)=100
M=One()
Print Eval(M)=100
Print K is M = true
Print K is type One = true
K=>add 500
Print eval(K)=600
\\ copy K to Z (no pointer to Z, Z is named group)
Z=Group(K)
Print eval(z)=600, z=600
Z.add 1000
Print Z=1600, Eval(M)=1600, Eval(K)=1600
\\ push a copy of Z, but state is pointer so we get a copy of a pointer
Push Group(Z)
Read beta
Beta.add 1000
Print Z=2600, Eval(M)=2600, Eval(K)=2600
\\ convert pointer to group (a copy of group)
group delta=One()
delta.add 1000
Print Z=3600, beta=3600, delta=3600, Eval(M)=3600, Eval(K)=3600
\\ M and K are pointers to groups
M=>add 400
Print Z=4000, beta=4000, delta=4000, Eval(M)=4000, Eval(K)=4000
}
CheckSingleton
</syntaxhighlight>
=={{header|Lasso}}==
Line 1,235 ⟶ 1,494:
===Server wide singleton===
<
// New definition supersede any current threads.
Line 1,251 ⟶ 1,510:
#b->switch = 'b'
#a->switch // b</
===Thread level singleton===
<
define singleton => type {
Line 1,270 ⟶ 1,529:
#b->switch = 'b'
#a->switch // b</
=={{header|Latitude}}==
Latitude objects are prototypes, so any new object can be treated as a singleton by simply not cloning it. For added security, one can always override <code>clone</code> to make it clear that the object should not be cloned, but this is generally overkill.
<
self id := 0.
self newID := {
Line 1,286 ⟶ 1,545:
println: Singleton newID. ; 1
println: Singleton newID. ; 2
println: Singleton newID. ; 3</
=={{header|Lingo}}==
In Lingo a Singleton class can be implemented like this:
<
property _instance
Line 1,311 ⟶ 1,570:
me._someProperty = me._someProperty + x
return me._someProperty
end</
=={{header|Logtalk}}==
Logtalk supports both classes and prototypes. A prototype is a much simpler solution for defining a singleton object than defining a class with only an instance.
<
:- public(value/1).
Line 1,330 ⟶ 1,589:
state(0).
:- end_object.</
A simple usage example after compiling and loading the code above:
<
Value = 0
yes
Line 1,338 ⟶ 1,597:
| ?- singleton::(set_value(1), value(Value)).
Value = 1
yes</
=={{header|NetRexx}}==
Uses a static field to avoid synchronization problems and the ''flawed'' "double-checked locking" idiom in JVMs. See [http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-dcl/index.html www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-dcl/index.html] for a detailed explanation.
<
options replace format comments java crossref symbols binary
Line 1,440 ⟶ 1,699:
return info
</syntaxhighlight>
{{out}}
Line 1,470 ⟶ 1,729:
=={{header|Nim}}==
In the file <code>singleton.nim</code> we don't export the type, so new objects can't be created:
<
foo*: int
var single* = Singleton(foo: 0)</
Then in another file we can use the singleton object:
<
single.foo = 12
echo single.foo</
=={{header|Objeck}}==
<
@singleton : static : Singleton;
Line 1,498 ⟶ 1,757:
...
}
}</
=={{header|Objective-C}}==
===Non-Thread-Safe===
(Using Cocoa/OpenStep's NSObject as a base class)
<
@interface SomeSingleton : NSObject
{
Line 1,511 ⟶ 1,770:
+ (SomeSingleton *)sharedInstance;
@end</
<
@implementation SomeSingleton
Line 1,550 ⟶ 1,809:
}
@end</
===Thread-Safe===
Same as above except:
<
{
static SomeSingleton *sharedInstance = nil;
Line 1,563 ⟶ 1,822:
}
return sharedInstance;
}</
===With GCD===
Same as above except:
<
{
static SomeSingleton *sharedInstance = nil;
Line 1,575 ⟶ 1,834:
});
return sharedInstance;
}</
===With class methods===
Line 1,592 ⟶ 1,851:
For instance, this Sequence class creates instances that increment an integer and send it. If a task tries to get the next value before it is incremented, it will wait until the channel is no more empty and holds the new value. This won't work if the value is a mutable value (you will get an exception if you try to send a mutable object into channel). A mutable object can't be shared between tasks. Here we send a new integer each time.
<
Sequence method: initialize(initialValue)
Channel newSize(1) := channel
@channel send(initialValue) drop ;
Sequence method: nextValue @channel receive dup 1 + @channel send drop ;</
Usage :
<
: testSequence
| s i |
Sequence new(0) ->s
100 loop: i [ #[ s nextValue println ] & ] ;</
=={{header|ooRexx}}==
<syntaxhighlight lang="oorexx">
a = .singleton~new
b = .singleton~new
Line 1,641 ⟶ 1,900:
a singleton.
::attribute foo
</syntaxhighlight>
=={{header|Oz}}==
Singleton is not a common pattern in Oz programs. It can be implemented by limiting the scope of the class definition such that only the <code>GetInstance</code> function has access to it.
<
local
class Singleton
Line 1,682 ⟶ 1,922:
end
end
end</
This will work as long as all functors are linked with <code>import</code> statements. If you use multiple calls to <code>Module.link</code> instead, you will get multiple instances of the "Singleton".
=={{header|Perl}}==
<
use strict;
use warnings;
Line 1,714 ⟶ 1,954:
my $s2 = Singleton->new;
printf "name: %s, ref: %s\n", $s2->name, $s2;</
=={{header|Phix}}==
Line 1,721 ⟶ 1,961:
or keep check() private and invoke it internally from a few critical routines.
Needs 0.8.1+
<
object chk = NULL
class singleton
Line 1,739 ⟶ 1,979:
s.check()
--s2.check() -- dies</
While all classes are technically global in the sense that builtins\structs.e knows all about them, the
implicit associated user defined type is by default private (ie w/o "global" in front of the class def).
Line 1,745 ⟶ 1,985:
<code>class s = new("singleton")</code> could still be used anywhere, and that way get duplicates.
One obvious alternative (of no special merit imo) might be to replace that global singleton s with:
<
if chk==NULL then
chk = new("singleton")
end if
return chk
end function</
Technically, builtins/struct.e looks like it could easily be modified to support something very similar
to the Python Borg pattern, by appropriately sharing cdx/tid in new(). However it would be even better
Line 1,758 ⟶ 1,998:
=={{header|PHP}}==
<
protected static $instance = null;
public $test_var;
Line 1,778 ⟶ 2,018:
echo $bar->test_var; //Prints 'One'
$fail = new Singleton(); //Fatal error</
=={{header|PicoLisp}}==
As there is no physical difference between classes and objects, we can use the
class symbol itself.
<
(dm message1> ()
Line 1,789 ⟶ 2,029:
(dm message2> ()
(prinl "This is method 2 on " This) )</
{{out}}
<pre>: (message1> '+Singleton)
Line 1,798 ⟶ 2,038:
This is method 2 on +Singleton
-> +Singleton</pre>
=={{header|Python}}==
Line 1,881 ⟶ 2,044:
Every instance of the Borg class will share the same state:
<
__state = {}
def __init__(self):
Line 1,899 ⟶ 2,062:
>>> b1.datum is b2.datum
True
>>> # For any datum!</
===per MetaClass/AbstractBaseClass===
Line 1,905 ⟶ 2,068:
An approximation of the singleton can be made using only class attributes to store data instead of the instance attributes, providing at least one abstract instance method (class can not be instantiated then) and making the rest of the methods being class methods. E.g.
<
import abc
Line 1,935 ⟶ 2,098:
Singleton.printSelf()
print Singleton.state
</syntaxhighlight>
When executed this code should print out the following:<br>
<br>
Line 1,951 ⟶ 2,114:
<
class Singleton(type):
_instances = {}
Line 1,961 ⟶ 2,124:
class Logger(object):
__metaclass__ = Singleton
</syntaxhighlight>
or in Python3
<
class Logger(metaclass=Singleton):
pass
</syntaxhighlight>
=={{header|Racket}}==
Singletons are not very useful in Racket, because functions that use module state are more straightforward. However, classes are first class values, and therefore they follow the same rules as all other bindings. For example, a class can be made and instantiated but not provided to client files:
<
#lang racket
(provide instance)
Line 1,981 ⟶ 2,144:
(super-new)))
(define instance (new singleton%))
</syntaxhighlight>
Or better, not name the class at all:
<
#lang racket
(provide instance)
Line 1,991 ⟶ 2,154:
(define/public (foo) 123)
(super-new))))
</syntaxhighlight>
=={{header|Raku}}==
(formerly Perl 6)
<syntaxhighlight lang="raku"
# We create a lexical variable in the class block that holds our single instance.
my Singleton $instance = Singleton.bless; # You can add initialization arguments here.
method new {!!!} # Singleton.new dies.
method instance { $instance; }
}</
=={{header|Ruby}}==
<
class MySingleton
include Singleton
Line 2,011 ⟶ 2,174:
a = MySingleton.instance # instance is only created the first time it is requested
b = MySingleton.instance
puts a.equal?(b) # outputs "true"</
=={{header|Scala}}==
The '''object''' construct in Scala is a singleton.
<
// any code here gets executed as if in a constructor
}</
=={{header|Sidef}}==
<
static instance;
Line 2,040 ⟶ 2,203:
s2.name = 'bar'; # change name in s2
say s1.name; #=> 'bar'</
=={{header|Slate}}==
Clones of Oddball themselves may not be cloned.
Methods and slots may still be defined on them:
<
=={{header|Smalltalk}}==
<
SomeClass class>>sharedInstance
SharedInstance ifNil: [SharedInstance := self basicNew initialize].
^ SharedInstance
</syntaxhighlight>
=={{header|Swift}}==
<
class SingletonClass {
Line 2,069 ⟶ 2,232:
// Usage
let sharedObject = SingletonClass.sharedInstance
</syntaxhighlight>
=={{header|Tcl}}==
Line 2,075 ⟶ 2,238:
ref http://wiki.tcl.tk/21595
<
# This is a metaclass, a class that defines the behavior of other classes
Line 2,095 ⟶ 2,258:
return [incr count]
}
}</
Demonstrating in an interactive shell:
<
::oo::Obj20
% set b [example new] ;# note how this returns the same object name
Line 2,110 ⟶ 2,273:
3
% $b counter
4</
=={{header|Tern}}==
Tern has built-in support for singletons via module declarations.
<
speak() {
println("I am a singleton");
Line 2,120 ⟶ 2,283:
}
Singleton.speak();</
{{out}}
Line 2,126 ⟶ 2,289:
I am a singleton
</pre>
=={{header|TXR}}==
<syntaxhighlight lang="txrlisp">;; Custom (:singleton) clause which adds behavior to a class
;; asserting against multiple instantiation.
(define-struct-clause :singleton ()
^((:static inst-count 0)
(:postinit (me)
(assert (<= (inc me.inst-count) 1)))))
(defstruct singleton-one ()
(:singleton)
(:method speak (me)
(put-line "I am singleton-one")))
(defstruct singleton-two ()
(:singleton)
(:method speak (me)
(put-line "I am singleton-two")))
;; Test
;; Global singleton
(defvarl s1 (new singleton-one))
;; Local singleton in function (like static in C)
;; load-time evaluates once.
(defun fn ()
(let ((s2 (load-time (new singleton-two))))
s2.(speak)))
s1.(speak)
(fn) ;; multiple calls to fn don't re-instantiate singleton-two
(fn)
(put-line "so far, so good")
(new singleton-two) ;; assertion gooes off</syntaxhighlight>
{{out}}
<pre>I am singleton-one
I am singleton-two
I am singleton-two
so far, so good
txr: unhandled exception of type assert:
txr: assertion (<= (inc me.inst-count)
1) failed in singleton.tl:6
txr: during evaluation at singleton.tl:6 of form (sys:rt-assert-fail "singleton.tl"
6 '(<= (inc me.inst-count)
1))</pre>
=={{header|Vala}}==
<
static Singleton? instance;
Line 2,151 ⟶ 2,364:
print("Equal.\n");
}
}</
=={{header|Wren}}==
Line 2,157 ⟶ 2,370:
In practice, it's unlikely anyone would bother; they'd just create a class with static methods and/or fields only which is effectively a singleton as there's only ever a single instance of a static field.
<
// Returns the singleton. If it hasn't been created, creates it first.
static instance { __instance == null ? __instance = Singleton.new_() : __instance }
Line 2,172 ⟶ 2,385:
var s2 = Singleton.instance
System.print("s1 and s2 are same object = %(Object.same(s1, s2))")
s1.speak() // call instance method</
{{out}}
Line 2,183 ⟶ 2,396:
A class declared static only has one instance, ever.
However, a class with the same name & structure could be created in another scope.
<
b1 := Borg; b2 := Borg();
b1 == b2 //--> True
b1.v=123; b2.v.println(); //--> 123</
{{omit from|6502 Assembly}}
{{omit from|68000 Assembly}}
{{omit from|8086 Assembly}}
{{omit from|ARM Assembly}}
{{omit from|AWK}}
{{omit from|GAP}}
Line 2,196 ⟶ 2,412:
{{omit from|Mathematica}}
{{omit from|Maxima}}
{{omit from|Minimal BASIC|Does not have user-defined data structures or objects.}}
{{omit from|Metafont}}
{{omit from|Nascom BASIC|Does not have user-defined data structures or objects.}}
{{omit from|OCaml}}
{{omit from|Octave}}
{{omit from|Palo Alto Tiny BASIC|Does not have user-defined data structures or objects.}}
{{omit from|PARI/GP}}
{{omit from|PL/0|Does not have user-defined data structures or objects.}}
{{omit from|plainTeX}}
{{omit from|Retro|No OOP}}
Line 2,205 ⟶ 2,425:
{{omit from|TI-83 BASIC}}
{{omit from|TI-89 BASIC|Does not have user-defined data structures or objects.}}
{{omit from|Tiny BASIC|Does not have user-defined data structures or objects.}}
{{omit from|x86 Assembly}}
{{omit from|Z80 Assembly}}
{{omit from|ZX Spectrum Basic|Does not have user-defined data structures or objects.}}
|