Anonymous user
Set consolidation: Difference between revisions
m
oops
(→Tcl: Added implementation) |
m (oops) |
||
Line 10:
:Given the two sets <tt>{A,B}</tt> and <tt>{C,D}</tt> then there is no common element between the sets and the result is the same as the input.
;'''Example 2:'''
:Given the two sets <tt>{A,B}</tt> and <tt>{B,D}</tt> then there is a common element <tt>B</tt> between the sets and the result is the single set <tt>{B,D,A}</tt>. (Note that order of items in a set is immaterial: <tt>{A,B,D}</tt> is the same as <tt>{B,D,A}</tt> and <tt>{D,A,B}</tt>, etc).
;'''Example 3:'''
:Given the three sets <tt>{A,B}</tt> and <tt>{C,D}</tt> and <tt>{D,B}</tt> then there is no common element between the sets <tt>{A,B}</tt> and <tt>{C,D}</tt> but the sets <tt>{A,B}</tt> and <tt>{D,B}</tt> do share a common element that consolidates to produce the result <tt>{B,D,A}</tt>. On examining this result with the remaining set, <tt>{C,D}</tt>, they share a common element and so consolidate to the final output of the single set <tt>{A,B,C,D}</tt>
| |||