SHA-256: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
| Line 1,316: | Line 1,316: | ||
pure nothrow @nogc in { |
pure nothrow @nogc in { |
||
assert(inBuffer.length % 64 == 0); |
assert(inBuffer.length % 64 == 0); |
||
} |
} do { |
||
// Round functions. |
// Round functions. |
||
static uint F1(in uint e, in uint f, in uint g) pure nothrow @safe @nogc { |
static uint F1(in uint e, in uint f, in uint g) pure nothrow @safe @nogc { |
||
| Line 1,567: | Line 1,567: | ||
<pre>764faf5c61ac315f1497f9dfa542713965b785e5cc2f707d6468d7d1124cdfcf</pre> |
<pre>764faf5c61ac315f1497f9dfa542713965b785e5cc2f707d6468d7d1124cdfcf</pre> |
||
This is a moderately efficient implementation, about 100 MB/s on a 4096 bytes input buffer on a 32 bit system, using the ldc2 compiler. On a more modern CPU (Intel Ivy Bridge) using HyperThreading, handwritten assembly by Intel is about twice faster. |
This is a moderately efficient implementation, about 100 MB/s on a 4096 bytes input buffer on a 32 bit system, using the ldc2 compiler. On a more modern CPU (Intel Ivy Bridge) using HyperThreading, handwritten assembly by Intel is about twice faster. |
||
=={{header|Delphi}}== |
=={{header|Delphi}}== |
||
{{libheader| System.SysUtils}} |
{{libheader| System.SysUtils}} |
||