Rosetta Code talk:Village Pump/Suggest a language: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(That's a MW "feature") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
RobinLRandall@gmail.com |
RobinLRandall@gmail.com |
||
:That is a limitation of MediaWiki. It has been discussed [[Rosetta_Code:Village_Pump/Features_Wanted#Simple_features|here]], but we have not had success. If you want to sign up and help us that would be great. As we are now (and for the forseeable future), we rely on volunteers, so it's tough to do much more than "default" with our setup. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 19:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC) |
:That is a limitation of MediaWiki. It has been discussed [[Rosetta_Code:Village_Pump/Features_Wanted#Simple_features|here]], but we have not had success. If you want to sign up and help us that would be great. As we are now (and for the forseeable future), we rely on volunteers, so it's tough to do much more than "default" with our setup. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 19:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
Thanks for the quick response. I was also looking for "Create an Object" for JavaScript and realized "Object-Oriented" Category was a bit hard to find. Until a "Google-like" search mechanism becomes available, a good organization is needed. I was thinking maybe splitting Languages into 1. Legacy Languages 2. Object-Oriented Languages 3. Scripting Languages, etc. Yes, there might be some overlap, but major categories would not be "hidden". I have been trying to help since meeting Michael Mol over the phone. I've been in the industry for 30 years so have about 20 languages under my belt. I'll look into MediaWiki to see what they have. |
|||
Thanks, |
|||
RR |
|||