Anonymous user
Rosetta Code talk:Finances: Difference between revisions
→Write-off?
(→Write-off?: Thoughts and positions) |
|||
Line 8:
::have you considered joining organizations like [[wp:Software in the Public Interest|Software in the Public Interest]] or the [[wp:Software Freedom Conservancy|Software Freedom Conservancy]]? --[[User:EMBee|eMBee]] 05:47, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
:::Not deeply. I'd have to look long and hard at it; I would be worried that any umbrella organization I might join wouldn't have the same goals as I have, and may not have a compatible mindset to mine. (I'm largely thinking about licenses, economics, politics and philosophy, which I can easily see being epicenters for disagreement in direction.) I wouldn't be averse to discussing options and opportunities with any interested party, though. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 15:18, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
::::well, there are only two really worth considering i think. SPI supports debian which includes even non-free software in their base so i don't think they'd have an issue with rosettacode supporting non-free language implementations. afterall, all the code is free. SFC is run by bradley kuhn who is working with the FSF which might be more of an issue regarding non-free languages but you'd have to ask. also i wonder if talking to them beats dealing with the IRS :-) --[[User:EMBee|eMBee]] 15:51, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
== Programming Task??? ==
| |||