Anonymous user
Rosetta Code talk:Add a Task: Difference between revisions
→First implementation
No edit summary |
|||
Line 4:
*Build a list (somewhere, anywhere, wikicode or semantic query, be as practical or creative as necessary) where we can see our existing task set and see how well the task description matches this page. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 17:41, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
==First implementation==
I certainly like the requirement for an implementation. It almost always makes things much easier for other
: Hi Donal, I would think that you don't actually have a task, draft or not, without that first implementation. They go together for me.<br> I don't often use the draft task status, and its usually when I find something that interests me, but I am unsure of wider interest, or might shift the focus of a task, as in [[Talk:Simple Quaternion type and operations]], and [[Talk:Short-circuit evaluation]], and [[Talk:Extreme floating point values]], and [[Horner's rule for polynomial evaluation]] - started as a draft I think because I couldn't get the formatting of the equations in the description right. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 05:47, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
| |||