Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosetta Code: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (update Vptopic template) |
m (update Vptopic template) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Vptopic |
{{Vptopic |
||
|topic=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosetta Code |
|topic=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rosetta Code |
||
|summary=It is probably worth chatting here and making a collaborative decision about the |
|summary=It is probably worth chatting here and making a collaborative decision about the "wp:Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rosetta_Code" page just created. |
||
}} |
}} |
||
re: [[wp:Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rosetta_Code]] |
|||
Personally it would be a shame not to have [[wp:Rosetta_Code]] as RC compliment's WP perfectly by providing a spectrum of alternative programming solutions to WP's own limited code examples. |
Personally it would be a shame not to have [[wp:Rosetta_Code]] as RC compliment's WP perfectly by providing a spectrum of alternative programming solutions to WP's own limited code examples. |
||
| Line 10: | Line 13: | ||
The WP editor that "contributed" does not specifically look like a [[wp:deletionist]], as a deletionist would likely wait for a "cool down" and then re "contribute" to [[wp:Articles_for_deletion]] until the page succumbs. |
The WP editor that "contributed" does not specifically look like a [[wp:deletionist]], as a deletionist would likely wait for a "cool down" and then re "contribute" to [[wp:Articles_for_deletion]] until the page succumbs. |
||
'''keep''' - none the less, I voted '''keep'''. If only because |
'''keep''' - none the less, I voted '''keep'''. (If only because RC has google foo!) - [[User:NevilleDNZ|NevilleDNZ]] 21:50, 8 October 2012 (UTC) |
||
[[User:NevilleDNZ|NevilleDNZ]] 21:44, 8 October 2012 (UTC) |
|||