Rosetta Code:Village Pump/TestML: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
m (Add missing sig) |
(Who writes the tests?) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
TestML is fairly new, and only available in a few languages, but this would be an interesting way to expand its horizons as well. |
TestML is fairly new, and only available in a few languages, but this would be an interesting way to expand its horizons as well. |
||
<small>—Preceding [[wp:Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Ingy]] ([[User_talk:Ingy|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ingy|contribs]]) 05:37, 6 September 2010 (UTC)</small> |
<small>—Preceding [[wp:Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Ingy]] ([[User_talk:Ingy|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ingy|contribs]]) 05:37, 6 September 2010 (UTC)</small> |
||
: So have you started writing any tests for examples? –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] 10:19, 8 November 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:19, 8 November 2010
TestML is a programming language agnostic, unit test language. It would be interesting to see TestML documents written for many Rosetta Code tasks. We could then show explicitly that implementations actually met the sufficient task criteria.
TestML is fairly new, and only available in a few languages, but this would be an interesting way to expand its horizons as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ingy (talk • contribs) 05:37, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- So have you started writing any tests for examples? –Donal Fellows 10:19, 8 November 2010 (UTC)