Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Task titles: Difference between revisions

→‎Proposal: Original task name references?
(→‎Proposal: You're all set.)
(→‎Proposal: Original task name references?)
Line 17:
To show you how I intend my rules to be applied, and to discern for myself how well they work, I've chosen [[Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Task titles/List|a title for every task]]. I've made a lot of exceptions, since I figure it's more important for titles to be short, accurate, and easy to understand than consistent with each other. One issue that particularly bothers me is number: some of my proposed titles are singular and some are plural, and my method to decide which should be which is pretty arbitrary; all I know for sure is that "Array" and "Accumulator factories" are both bad titles. And there are some tasks, like [[Top Rank Per Group]], for which I can't think of any remotely good title. At any rate, for the most part, I think the new titles would be an improvement. —[[User:Underscore|Underscore]] ([[User talk:Underscore|Talk]]) 20:38, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
: As I haven't seen anyone seriously critique your new names, I've put you in the groups with the relevant privs. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 23:17, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
 
I missed the above. Probably because of the holiday season. I have a comment, OK, it is vanity, but I am wondering about references to the original task names, Will they still work? I would like to still be able to track [[User talk:Paddy3118#RC_vanity_search.py|my initial contributions]]. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 05:27, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Anonymous user