Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Task creation process discussion: Difference between revisions

Line 48:
:I think that an existing C hash-table or data-structure library should be used, and that Rosetta Code should avoid reimplementing libraries like this -- [[Creating an Associative Array]] is oriented toward *using* an implementation, not making one, even if it doesn't explicitly say so. (And for what it's worth, I think the general principle to apply is: what would be enlightening to the reader?) --[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 19:59, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
::Partly I agree. But the lib should be widespread and common (considered almost standard) (?), and I've found no such a lib (if you know one, tell me —it must be simple, not like SunriseDD I've found... it is overdimensioned for this and other tasks... but as last resort I will try to learn and use this). If widespread or ''almost'' standard are not requirements, I would upload my "hash-table" implementation to my site and drop a link to it, I suppose theoretically there's nothing wrong in doing so, since we are not really interested in performance or what (what about this? Can I use libs I've created, of course as GPLed code?). The implementation's aim of my code was to be able to write the algorithm almost as a translation of Java code. --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 00:03, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
:::I suppose I could use [http://uthash.sourceforge.net/ uthash], it seems simple enough. Going to adapt the code, but not this night:D --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 00:25, 22 December 2008 (UTC)