Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Semantic MediaWiki: Difference between revisions

→‎Issues: Observation on why SMW ate the "Example" namespace.
(→‎Issues: #semantic-mediawiki)
(→‎Issues: Observation on why SMW ate the "Example" namespace.)
Line 31:
::: A similar fix should be done to Libheader template, since libheader with "arg" like DBD::Mysql or alike is again interpreted by SMW. --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 08:35, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
:::: Yeah, I know. I need (anyone could) to talk to the folks in #semantic-mediawiki on Freenode to find out exactly how, but I haven't had the time. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 13:24, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
 
I think SMW ate the "Example" namespace because it added a "Property" namespace, and was not expecting there to be any other namespaces. It seems to be treating the "Example" namespace as it should be treating the "Property" namespace. It may be calling out for the namespace by the index value it expected it to have. --[[User:Coderjoe|Coderjoe]] 05:59, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
Anonymous user