Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Review templates: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 23:14, 27 July 2009

So it looks like we need to review the review templates. Recently a new user (Russell) added a task to a "lang examples needing review" category because the example accomplished the task, but not as well as it could have. I think this is a valid reason for review, but none of the templates really fit. Here are the current templates:

Which should be used for what? Do any need to be removed/changed? Am I crazy? --Mwn3d 23:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

For my part what I felt was missing was a "incomplete" or "inelegant" template. Many of the programing tasks have multiple goals to reach, e.g. Reversing a string and Closest pair problem. For both of those, since I'm not an expert with R, I picked the low hanging fruit. But each had a slightly more complex goal that was somewhat out of my reach. I knew that if I marked it as being "done", I'd have sold the capacities of R somewhat short. I wanted to be sure that others still knew there was work to be done on that problem. Russell 23:14, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 *[[Template:Needs-review]]
 Which should be used for what? Do any need to be removed/changed? Am I crazy? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 23:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
+For my part what I felt was missing was a "incomplete" or "inelegant" template.  Many of the programing tasks have multiple goals to reach, e.g. [[Reversing a string]] and [[Closest pair problem]]. For both of those, since I'm not an expert with R, I picked the low hanging fruit.  But each had a slightly more complex goal that was somewhat out of my reach.  I knew that if I marked it as being "done", I'd have sold the capacities of R somewhat short. I wanted to be sure that others still knew there was work to be done on that problem. [[User:Russell|Russell]] 23:14, 27 July 2009 (UTC)