Anonymous user
Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Review templates: Difference between revisions
Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Review templates (view source)
Revision as of 00:54, 28 July 2009
, 14 years agocomment on my experience
No edit summary |
(comment on my experience) |
||
Line 6:
For my part what I felt was missing was a "incomplete" or "inelegant" template. Many of the programing tasks have multiple goals to reach, e.g. [[Reversing a string]] and [[Closest pair problem]]. For both of those, since I'm not an expert with R, I picked the low hanging fruit. But each had a slightly more complex goal that was somewhat out of my reach. I knew that if I marked it as being "done", I'd have sold the capacities of R somewhat short. I wanted to be sure that others still knew there was work to be done on that problem. [[User:Russell|Russell]] 23:14, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
For my examples, I have often just directly written <nowiki>[[Category:E examples needing attention]]</nowiki> (sometimes with a HTML comment) to put it in the category without any bold notice box. I think it would be not a bad idea to have both "incomplete" (does not yet meet task criteria, but is useful to present anyway) and "inelegant" ("does not meet the quality my language's examples ought to have"). The latter, in particular, should be a particularly quiet box -- e.g. no colored backgrond, maybe even smaller text and/or collapsed until clicked. --[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 00:54, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
| |||