Rosetta Code:Village Pump/RC extraction Tool and Task: Difference between revisions

more on dual lic
(More on tasks and RC reorg)
(more on dual lic)
Line 56:
:: --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 21:00, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
::: I do think the dual-license side is extremely difficult to navigate, if not impossible. However, the nature of the dual-license is use-as-this-or-that, and since GFDL is one of those, then treating it as GFDL should be safe. IANAL, but that's what I believe. No content on Rosetta Code has an "invariant" section, as described in the GFDL license. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 13:33, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 
:: I'm not sure how much the Dual Licensing will hold up. Every page clearly states the contents are GDFL and not to contribute non-public domain works. If someone does, and it were found the contributor would have violated the license and the RC terms of use and presumably we would just remove the offending bits. --[[User:Dgamey|Dgamey]] 13:13, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Anonymous user