Rosetta Code:Village Pump/More convenient links to tasks: Difference between revisions

← Older edit

Rosetta Code:Village Pump/More convenient links to tasks (view source)

Revision as of 22:25, 7 July 2015

1,291 bytes added , 8 years ago

a possible way forward...

Rdm

6,962

edits

Revision as of 19:28, 14 September 2014 (view source) rosettacode>CRGreathouse (preferences) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 22:25, 7 July 2015 (view source) Rdm (talk \| contribs) (a possible way forward...)
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 16: :::: That would be better than the current behavior, but still suboptimal. I think the best behavior would be to link to the section, with an icon to go to the general page; next best would be to link straight to the anchor; next would be linking to the general page with an icon for the anchor; worst is the current situation. -- [[User:CRGreathouse\|CRGreathouse]] ([[User talk:CRGreathouse\|talk]]) 19:28, 14 September 2014 (UTC) ::::: What if we changed the template for the solution header so that it included a link back to the task description/top of the page? Then the implementation links on the language page could link directly to the language solution, and there'd be a link right there to go up top to read the task description. [[User:Markjreed\|Markjreed]] ([[User talk:Markjreed\|talk]]) 04:40, 11 February 2015 (UTC) :: My take on how to solve this issue is to '''introduce collapsible language sections'''. If entering a task without the language tag, all the language sections could be collapsed with options to open them. If entering using a tag, then the general description of the task and the tagged language would be open. --[[User:Holroy\|Holroy]] ([[User talk:Holroy\|talk]]) 19:15, 5 March 2015 (UTC) ::: I wrote a blog entry, [http://oddsbyeven.blogspot.com/2015/03/bookmarklet-idea-collapse-all.html Boomarklet Idea - Collapse all subsections], to illustrate my concept of collapsing language sections. --[[User:Holroy\|Holroy]] ([[User talk:Holroy\|talk]]) 21:16, 5 March 2015 (UTC) :::: Ideally, if this were implemented, it would be implemented in the wiki software we use here (which I believe is [[mw:Gerrit\|mediawiki]]). --[[User:Rdm\|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm\|talk]]) 22:25, 7 July 2015 (UTC)