Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Language template enhancements: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(I like official website) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
What kinds of things would be useful to add to the language template? Official website? Largest IRC support channel? --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 02:48, 14 February 2009 (UTC) |
What kinds of things would be useful to add to the language template? Official website? Largest IRC support channel? --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 02:48, 14 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
:Official website would be cool. You should use named arguments when you add these things. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 03:06, 14 February 2009 (UTC) |
:Official website would be cool. You should use named arguments when you add these things. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 03:06, 14 February 2009 (UTC) |
||
:How about "syntax highlighting tag" so that we can standardize unimplemented languages and let people know what to use for supported ones? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 22:35, 14 February 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 22:35, 14 February 2009
What kinds of things would be useful to add to the language template? Official website? Largest IRC support channel? --Short Circuit 02:48, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- Official website would be cool. You should use named arguments when you add these things. --Mwn3d 03:06, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
- How about "syntax highlighting tag" so that we can standardize unimplemented languages and let people know what to use for supported ones? --Mwn3d 22:35, 14 February 2009 (UTC)