Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Grouping tasks: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(I would like to group some tasks.) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Vptopic |
|||
|topic=Grouping tasks |
|||
|summary=A request to categorize some programming tasks}} |
|||
I would like to group these tasks in <nowiki>[[Category:Higher-order functions]]</nowiki>. |
I would like to group these tasks in <nowiki>[[Category:Higher-order functions]]</nowiki>. |
||
| Line 10: | Line 12: | ||
However, the system of categories under [[:Category:Solutions by Programming Task]] is to difficult for me to understand, so I will not yet group these tasks. I just learned that [[Template:Task]] takes a parameter (as <nowiki>{{task|something goes here}}</nowiki>). --[[User:Kernigh|Kernigh]] 17:31, 20 April 2011 (UTC) |
However, the system of categories under [[:Category:Solutions by Programming Task]] is to difficult for me to understand, so I will not yet group these tasks. I just learned that [[Template:Task]] takes a parameter (as <nowiki>{{task|something goes here}}</nowiki>). --[[User:Kernigh|Kernigh]] 17:31, 20 April 2011 (UTC) |
||
:Yeah I had tried to organize the tasks long ago, but it didn't work as well as I had hoped. It would be a little easier to understand with the category tree extension, but it still wouldn't be that good. The argument for the task template is for a category to put it in. I say go ahead and make the category. I think people use [[:Category:Programming Tasks]] in general anyway, so it won't confuse people. If you can think of any more groups go ahead and suggest them here. Maybe we can give the organization another shot. --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 17:54, 20 April 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:54, 20 April 2011
Grouping tasks
This is a particular discussion thread among many which consider Rosetta Code.
This is a particular discussion thread among many which consider Rosetta Code.
Summary
A request to categorize some programming tasks
Discussion
I would like to group these tasks in [[Category:Higher-order functions]].
- First-class functions
- Function composition
- Higher-order functions
- Partial function application
- Y combinator
However, the system of categories under Category:Solutions by Programming Task is to difficult for me to understand, so I will not yet group these tasks. I just learned that Template:Task takes a parameter (as {{task|something goes here}}). --Kernigh 17:31, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah I had tried to organize the tasks long ago, but it didn't work as well as I had hoped. It would be a little easier to understand with the category tree extension, but it still wouldn't be that good. The argument for the task template is for a category to put it in. I say go ahead and make the category. I think people use Category:Programming Tasks in general anyway, so it won't confuse people. If you can think of any more groups go ahead and suggest them here. Maybe we can give the organization another shot. --Mwn3d 17:54, 20 April 2011 (UTC)