Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Fortran 77, 90 etc.: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Created page with "Hi everyone, I noticed that Fortran setions usually specify something like "works with Fortran 90", or even that code said to be F77 is usung F90 features (even :: or free form ...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Vptopic |
|||
|topic=Fortran 77, 90 etc. |
|||
|summary=Adding subsection for Fortran 77 and Fortran 90 |
|||
}} |
|||
Hi everyone, |
Hi everyone, |
||
Revision as of 08:41, 31 August 2011
Fortran 77, 90 etc.
This is a particular discussion thread among many which consider Rosetta Code.
This is a particular discussion thread among many which consider Rosetta Code.
Summary
Adding subsection for Fortran 77 and Fortran 90
Discussion
Hi everyone,
I noticed that Fortran setions usually specify something like "works with Fortran 90", or even that code said to be F77 is usung F90 features (even :: or free form !). I'd like to add Fortran 77 code to some tasks, since I like this language a bit ;-) I would create systematic subsections "Fortran 77", "Fortran 90", or "Fortran 2003" or more for code using newer features of the language. My questions are :
- Is it better to create subsections or to add new languages ?
- Is there any problem in adding F77 code to tasks that already have F90 ?
Toucan 08:39, 31 August 2011 (UTC)