Anonymous user
Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Fight spam: Difference between revisions
Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Fight spam (view source)
Revision as of 22:40, 18 March 2014
, 10 years agoadded a comment about captha.
m (Forgot signature) |
m (added a comment about captha.) |
||
Line 42:
Couldn't CAPTCHA be disabled for already registered and "tested" users? --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 15:03, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
: That's where we were earlier this week. I might reduce the captcha conditions this weekend if the spam doesn't drop off. At any rate, I'm going to have to mod things a bit to deal with spammers, and it might be possible to drop the CAPTCHAs altogether at that point. --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 15:46, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
:: Could the ''captha'' issue be re-addressed (as far as being more friendly to tried-and-true bona fide Rosetta Code contributors)? I have a bunch of updates/fixes to do (more like a ton of "renaming" to clean up orphan files) and at this point, it's just a massive waste of my time trying to fight the captha "who's on first" game. (Could it be changed to rock-paper-scissors-Spock-lizard? --- just kidding.) How about what MathWorld (TM) uses for it's "bug" reports? MathWorld has never failed me yet. If it's good enough for the gander, it's good enough for the goose. It's bad enough just adding links or worse yet, creating a new page, and ''then'' adding a link that you forgot. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:40, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
==Done?==
It looks like it's done for now. Did anyone do anything or did they just give up? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 18:25, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
| |||