Rosetta Code:Village Pump/FBSL Categorization Question: Difference between revisions

: As for the BASIC's namespace, the idea seems reasonable though one should realise there are BASIC's and BASIC's. For instance, FBSL doesn't position itself as a BASIC but rather as a scripting language as is clearly stated by its name. FBSL can have a subtree of its own with separate branches for BASIC-style, assembly-style, C-style, and mixed solutions. Personally, I prefer to keep things simple and I wouldn't bloat my code with C or assembly just to spawn a window or recode a BMP into a PPM. Nor would I use OOP if I can avoid it. As long as FBSL supports it, it will always be my own prerogative which particular methods I choose. But some other user coming up here with histheir own solution should have a chance to upload histheir assembly code version too, and it only seems reasonable that they shouldn't do it in the BASIC branch of the tree.

: This was the main reasonmotive for my message that I wanted to get through.