Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Extraneous Printing Requirements in Tasks: Difference between revisions

m
formatting.
(Not really a fan of this suggestion.)
m (formatting.)
 
Line 21:
Would it be okay with people if I were to go ahead and make these edits? In that case, should I first propose these edits in the discussion pages for each task, or is this (as it seems to me) an obvious enough improvement that I can just go ahead and make the change?
 
*:# There have been many cases where it took the mental unraveling of the code to find that the code did not actually perform the task.
*:# Some languages show an ease in generating output when compared to others.
*:# I would not support such blanket altering of established tasks as new examples would no longer be solving the same thing.
Anonymous user