Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Examples needing attention not useful: Difference between revisions
(Creation) |
(Update on alternative table) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The category should only list those languages that currently have at least one example with issues. |
The category should only list those languages that currently have at least one example with issues. |
||
=Alternative presentation= |
|||
How about a table like [[User:AndiPersti/Sandbox|this]]? It uses a Semantic Wiki query for [[Property:Example requires attention]] and puts the result into a sortable table. (Currently only [[Template:Incorrect]] sets this property). --[[User:AndiPersti|Andreas Perstinger]] ([[User talk:AndiPersti|talk]]) 21:49, 19 March 2014 (UTC) |
|||
:Ok, I finally came up with the following table: [[User:AndiPersti/Examples needing attention]]. It works for me thus I'll leave it as it is. --[[User:AndiPersti|Andreas Perstinger]] ([[User talk:AndiPersti|talk]]) 18:09, 22 March 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 18:09, 22 March 2014
This is a particular discussion thread among many which consider Rosetta Code.
Summary
The main Rosetta page has a "Ways to contribute" box, linking to "Examples needing attention". That category lists languages that do not have examples needing attention.
Discussion
Since the Examples Needing Attention category lists numerous languages which do not currently have examples that need attention, it not useful as a "way to contribute".
The user has no way to find examples that need attention and fix them. (Presumably that would be the "way to contribute" through such a category).
The category should only list those languages that currently have at least one example with issues.
Alternative presentation
How about a table like this? It uses a Semantic Wiki query for Property:Example requires attention and puts the result into a sortable table. (Currently only Template:Incorrect sets this property). --Andreas Perstinger (talk) 21:49, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
- Ok, I finally came up with the following table: User:AndiPersti/Examples needing attention. It works for me thus I'll leave it as it is. --Andreas Perstinger (talk) 18:09, 22 March 2014 (UTC)