Rosetta Code:Village Pump/Examples needing attention: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
("examples needing attention" still useful?) |
(Applied Template:vptopic) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Vptopic |
|||
|topic=Examples needing attention |
|||
|summary=Are folks still using the various Examples needing attention pages? |
|||
}} |
|||
Are folks still using the various "<language> examples needing attention" pages? Today, a whole bunch of new ones were created as orphans, so they don't show up from the main [[:Category:Examples needing attention]]. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 20:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC) |
Are folks still using the various "<language> examples needing attention" pages? Today, a whole bunch of new ones were created as orphans, so they don't show up from the main [[:Category:Examples needing attention]]. --[[User:IanOsgood|IanOsgood]] 20:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC) |
||
:I was trying to keep up with those edits today. I think someone had a bot do it. It looked like they were creating the pages based on broken links. I didn't think anyone used those pages either, so I didn't fix the edits to them. I don't use them, but it may be best to ask Short Circuit before we change the way they work. For now I guess we should put the enaheader's on? --[[User:Mwn3d|Mwn3d]] 21:44, 1 December 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 01:34, 10 November 2010
Examples needing attention
This is a particular discussion thread among many which consider Rosetta Code.
This is a particular discussion thread among many which consider Rosetta Code.
Summary
Are folks still using the various Examples needing attention pages?
Discussion
Are folks still using the various "<language> examples needing attention" pages? Today, a whole bunch of new ones were created as orphans, so they don't show up from the main Category:Examples needing attention. --IanOsgood 20:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- I was trying to keep up with those edits today. I think someone had a bot do it. It looked like they were creating the pages based on broken links. I didn't think anyone used those pages either, so I didn't fix the edits to them. I don't use them, but it may be best to ask Short Circuit before we change the way they work. For now I guess we should put the enaheader's on? --Mwn3d 21:44, 1 December 2008 (UTC)